Follow real-time updates on Union Budget 2023Catch exclusive videos on Union Budget 2023 from CNBC-TV18
The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought responses from the Centre and the eleven sugarcane-producing states including Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra on the PIL filed by a former parliamentarian seeking implementation of a mechanism providing payment of dues of farmers within 14 days from supply of sugarcane to the mills. It also sought responses from four sugarcane purchasing firms and they are Bajaj Hindustan Sugar Limited, Indian Sugarmills Association, Cane Agro Energy (India) Limited and Indian Sucrose Ltd.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought responses from the Centre and the eleven sugarcane-producing states including Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra on the PIL filed by a former parliamentarian seeking implementation of a mechanism providing payment of dues of farmers within 14 days from supply of sugarcane to the mills. A bench comprising Chief Justice N V Ramana and Jusitce Surya Kant took note of the submissions of senior advocate Anand Grover, appearing for Maharashtra's former Lok Sabha MP Raju Anna Shetti, that the sugarcane suppliers be paid their dues within 14 days of the supply across the country as envisaged by an order of the Allahabad High Court.
Recommended ArticlesView All
World Cancer Day 2023: Early detection is crucial for reducing the global burden
Feb 4, 2023 IST5 Min(s) Read
World Cancer Day 2023: A way forward to better management of cancer this year!
Feb 4, 2023 IST6 Min(s) Read
Pakistan economy at alarming level as foreign reserves drop to $3.1 billion from $16.6 billion in a year
Feb 3, 2023 IST3 Min(s) Read
FM Nirmala Sitharaman speaks on inflation, taxes, GDP and more. Read the full interview here
Feb 3, 2023 IST37 Min(s) Read
“Issue notice. List it after three weeks”, the bench said after Grover pointed out cases of states which have been defaulting in big way in ensuring the payment to the farmers. The senior lawyer alleged that the sugar mills have indulged in diversion of funds and are not making payment to the farmers and hence their stock of sugar should be attached for realisation of dues of agriculturists.
As per the UP Sugarcane Supply Act, it is mandatory to pay the cane growers their dues within 14 days and interest on the amount if not paid dues within the stipulated time period. Besides the Centre, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra, the top court also issued notices to Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Gujarat, Bihar, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu.
It also sought responses from four sugarcane purchasing firms and they are Bajaj Hindustan Sugar Limited, Indian Sugarmills Association, Cane Agro Energy (India) Limited and Indian Sucrose Ltd.
Shetti, in his PIL, has sought the setting up of a mechanism for payment of price of sugarcane produce to the cane farmers in order to avoid accumulation of such dues and preventing the farmers from falling in the vicious cycle when a mill is declared sick and their dues of sugarcane produce remained unpaid during the process of resolution or liquidation of sugar mill leading to deterioration of condition of farmers.
The former lawmaker, who is also the president of the local political outfit Swabhimani Paksha', is joined by four sugarcane producing agriculturists as co-petitioners whose cane dues are not paid by sugar mills or factories since 2015-16 in Maharashtra. “We have inter-alia raised the plea in the petition that the State Govt. /Central Govt. failed to discharge their statutory duties for payment of outstanding dues of the cane growers by the Mill /owner under respective state legislation and also violation of fundamental rights of the sugar cane growers and sellers under Article 21 of the Constitution”, Shetti said in a statement.
As per Control Order, the payment to sugarcane suppliers shall be made within 14 days from the date of supply of sugarcane and the authorities should take strict actions against the defaulting sugar mills for violation of the provisions, the plea said.
Further, the defaulting sugar mills ought to be prosecuted under the provisions of the Essentials Commodities Act for violation of provisions under the Sugar (Control) Order, it said.